The Rescuers Down UnderReleased: November 16th, 1990
This is legit one of my favorite movies.
Rank | Title | Year | Grade |
---|---|---|---|
13 | The Great Mouse Detective | 1986 | B- |
14 | The Rescuers Down Under | 1990 | B- |
15 | A Goofy Movie | 1995 | B |
Oh my good goddamn, I had high hopes for this movie holding up and it did.
Cody is darling. Bernard and Bianca are at their best. John Candy as Wilbur is the best replacement we could have gotten for Orville (given that the voice actor had died) - he's perfection in this film. Jake the Kangaroo Mouse is charming and just enough of a background character to make Bernard and Bianca's relationship the focus of their time together. Joanna! What a jerk she is. And McLeach is just EVIL. I love it.
Notable Grossness
per Wikipedia - "In addition to this, Ranft entered creative disagreements with the studio management and marketing executives, including one disagreement where he optioned for the casting of an Aboriginal Australian child actor to voice Cody, which was overridden with the decision to cast "a little white blonde kid." Also McLeach calls Joanna "stupid" and "idiot" a lot.
The animation in this is mostly great. The flight scenes in particular, but also zooming through the outback, the animals' mannerisms, the restaurant scene at the beginning with the bugs preparing pea soup. There's a lot of really delightful animation to enjoy. The only thing I think they got lazy on is McLeach's big truck - it looked like a different truck every single time I saw it and it plays a pretty big part of this film.
I love the music. There aren't any songs with lyrics, and I think that suits this film.
I was so disappointed to read the critical reception on Wikipedia - people did not think this movie was good for a lot of the reasons that I thought it WAS good. There were complaints that Disney was trying to build off the Crocodile Dundee Australia hype and that it was over by the time this movie was made; this movie made me SUPER interested in Australia.
There were complaints that the animators didn't even use the Australian locale to great benefit and that the movie "could have taken place anywhere". I'm not sure what better use they could have made of the Australian outback locale than having a bunch of native wild animals and showing Uluru; maybe it's just cuz I'm a city kid but I think any movie set in a place without a lot of human civilization basically just has to rely on the animals and scenery, so...... ¯_(ツ)_/¯ I am much happier it was set in the outback than having some kind of obligatory "running through the opera house" scenes if it had been set in Sydney. I just thought that was a weird critique.
There were criticisms that the Rescuers didn't appear until too far into the film and they were only partially involved; this is literally why I like this movie better than the original Rescuers. Cody has agency. Cody is trying to solve problems himself. The Rescuers help, but he's the hero of this movie (or rather, they all are). I love this structure.
Also I want to address this particular bit of criticism: "The villain is far too malignant, the young vigilante hero seems to be a kiddie 'Rambo,' and some of the action is quite violent, if not tasteless." Personally I think "the villain is too mean" is a pretty ridiculous complaint. The kid has a pocketknife and cuts through a couple of ropes. This is hardly Rambo territory.
Anyway, all in all, I love this dang ol movie. I initially had it higher on the list but the more I thought about it the more I realized I'm leaning into nostalgia. Now that I've seen it again, I probably won't watch it for a long time. I'd be far more likely to turn on The Jungle Book than this one.